EMERY: The integration of state, business and technology is a serious threat to our freedoms
Warning: This column contains disturbing content. The reader’s discretion is advised.
The so-called anti-vaccines are vilified for allegedly putting the rest of society at risk by failing to comply with getting the jab.
Some simply oppose the loss of freedom of choice when they are mandated to do so or risk losing their fundamental freedoms.
For others, it doesn’t necessarily mean being anti-vaccine. It is about opposing vaccines contaminated by abortion and other drugs.
Conscientious objectors cannot stand the brutality involved in obtaining fetal cells used in the research and development of COVID-19 vaccines, organ transplants, or other medical issues.
All COVID-19 – and other – vaccines available to Canadians at some point in their development have relied on cell lines derived from aborted fetal tissue. Pfizer has just been exposed for trying to hide its use of cell lines from the public.
But even Pope Francis has decreed that during a pandemic, the good of life-saving vaccines outweighs unborn children being aborted to create them.
Just as those who choose not to get the vaccine aren’t the bad guys, neither are those who are. No one wants to die.
The culprits are researchers who use barbaric and unethical methods to reach human tissue and are sometimes caught lying.
Fresh flesh or live cells are needed to harvest the cell lines used in many vaccines. There are currently 1,559 recorded cell lines that have required hundreds of unborn children sacrificed during development.
Biologist Pamela Acker, author of Vaccination: a Catholic perspective, describes how certain cell lines are obtained.
“These babies were literally placed alive in a refrigerator and then stored for between one and 24 hours until they could be dismembered,” Acker said. LifeSite News.
“The babies were – and in some cases the uterus as well – removed from the woman, and without even piercing the amniotic sac, placed directly in the refrigerator where it was kept for no more than 24 hours,” he said. Acker said.
She separated from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation over ethical concerns regarding the use of the HEK-293 cell line used in many COVID-19 vaccines.
In 2020, Chinese biotech company Walvax announced its coronavirus vaccine, with distribution of 200 million doses per year slated to begin in mid-2021.
WALVAX2, the most recent aborted fetal cell line, is the ninth baby in its developmental series. It was derived from lung tissue obtained from an aborted female at the end of her first trimester.
Walvax did not mention that this vaccine came from a custom baby that was cut up alive.
“With WALVX-2, they pre-selected mothers and fathers. They did all kinds of testing, ”said Dr Jose Trasancos, CEO of the Texas-based nonprofit Children of God for Life, which is dedicated to ending the use of aborted children. biomedical research and commerce.
Parents excluded were those who were employed with environmental exposures, genetic abnormalities and a family history of chronic illnesses.
“They selected nine babies. They scheduled induced abortions. The child was born alive. It is dissected from birth. What they do to support babies in China, they do here to a certain extent.
Whether it’s using aborted fetal cells for vaccines or other medical purposes, “it’s basically a ladle of water in one bucket.”
The end results of these research projects inevitably end up in Canada.
The University of Pennsylvania is under investigation for methods used in ex vivo research on liver profusion for liver transplants.
“The principal investigator is Dr Jorg Gerlech. He works with the livers of aborted fetuses. Lately, they haven’t been aborted at all. They were born alive. They had their liver dissolved while they are still alive, ”said Trasancos.
“This is premeditated murder and the looting of a body. This is supported by the scientific literature. It is not speculation. It is not sensationalism. This is what the man wrote.
Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh were also criticized in May for carrying out experiments where the scalps of aborted five-month-old babies were sewn onto laboratory rats and mice. Why? To see how long hairs would grow on humanized mice for the purpose of treating infections on human skin.
This research was funded by several grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
“The fact that they were using scalps from aborted five-month-old babies means that the heads of these children probably had to be intact to get scalps, indicating that it was either a partial or even a partial abortion. ‘an abortion. infants born alive and whole, ”said David Daleiden, director of the Center for Medical Progress.
Dr Kyle McKenna, a researcher at the Ohio Franciscan University in Steubenville, said the increasingly desensitized scientific community is pushing the boundaries of the use of fetal tissue research. And no one pushes back hard enough.
“All people of good conscience have a responsibility to voice their opposition in order to promote the development of alternatives,” he said.
It does so in a herd immunity study to COVID-19 involving the development of an antibody test that does not use materials produced in cell lines from aborted tissue.
TOMORROW: Let’s take a closer look at the alternatives.
Slobodian is the Manitoba Senior Columnist for the Western Standard